I recently received this email from a friend of mine,
I have a question about 2 Timothy 3:14-17, which reads:
“14 But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have become
convinced of, because you know those from whom you learned it, 15 and
how from infancy you have known the holy Scriptures, which are able to
make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 16 All
Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking,
correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the man of God
may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.”
First, what is the original word used for “scripture” and
“scriptures,” and what does it mean (more fully)?
Second, assuming the word means Biblical writings, how do we know what
is included as “all Scripture” — just Old Testament writings, or does
it include the Gospels, too?
Third, can this passage possibly be referring to itself? Or to
“scriptures” that may not have been written yet as of the composition
date of that letter? Like, if John and Acts were written later, do
I’d like to know your thoughts, or if you have some references you
could point me to.
These are some really good questions and I appreciate your desire to learn more about it. I hope this helps.
1) The word used in the New Testament for “scripture” is the greek word γραφη (graphe) which is normally defined as “writing” and is the root for many English words – autograph, stenograph, grapheme, etc. When used in the New Testament it always refers to inspired scripture (hence its translation as “scripture” and not “writings”).
2) The possibilities of what “scripture” can refer to in the New Testament does depend on what has been written to that point. Obviously you cannot make reference to something that does not yet exist. So the Gospels can only reference the Old Testament (Mtt 21:42, Mtt 22:29, Mtt 26:54, Mark 12:10, etc) usually to remind people that certain scriptures were to be fulfilled and Jesus often says that he has fulfilled them.
Timothy had a mother who was a Jew and a father who was a Gentile (Acts 16:1). The scriptures he was raised on “from infancy” would have almost certainly been the Old Testament. It should be noted that the word translated here “scriptures” is not the same as the word in 3:16 (grammata in 3:15 vs. graphe in 3:16) but Paul’s meaning is almost certainly the same. Some could argue that Paul must have meant something different in these two verses since he used two different words (Old Testament vs Old + Some of the New?) but that is unfounded and not very likely. Paul says that these scriptures are “able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.” (3:15). Is Paul referencing the fulfillment of OT scripture that could build our faith in Jesus being the Christ or does this mean he is referencing some NT material as well? I don’t know that we can get a solid answer but we do have some clues.
- In 1 Cor 7 Paul seems to make a distinction between what his opinion is and the parts of what he is writing that are from God (esp 7:10). That might indicate that Paul understood some of what he wrote to be inspired scripture even as he was writing it. 1 Corinthians was probably written between 54-56. 2 Timothy was probably written around 65-66. If Paul believed what he wrote in 1 Corinthians and other letters prior to 2 Timothy (basically all of Paul’s other letters since he was executed in 67) were inspired then 2 Tim 3:14-17 could reference his own writings as inspired and useful for correcting, rebuking, etc.
- In 2 Peter 3:14-16 Peter almost certainly references the writings of Paul as on the level with other inspired scriptures. This would mean the apostles viewed Paul’s writings as inspired scripture.
So when Paul says “all scripture” in 66 AD he is definitely referring at a minimum to the OT (as that is what Timothy’s mother and grandmother had taught him) and there is the potential that he is making reference to any of the NT writings to that time because Paul and the apostles probably viewed those writings as inspired.
3) This would not be a reference to anything written after that point but that does not mean that this passage does not apply to them. Paul didn’t know Revelation would be written by John 25 years after Paul’s death but because Revelation is inspired it would certainly fall in the category of that which is useful for teaching, rebuking, etc.
I hope my thoughts have not been too jumbled up. I have had a couple of trains of thought running through my head all at once. Let me sum it up. There is a very good possibility that what Paul is referring to in 2 Timothy is more than the Old Testament because it appears that at least Paul and Peter viewed the epistles as inspired. It also can apply to what is written after 2 Timothy, although Paul couldn’t have known it because it wasn’t yet written. What makes it applicable is that God inspired all of it and if it is inspired, it is useful.
I think you covered that rather well. Good detail without giving to much, nice use of the Greek origins.
It would appear to me saints that we really cannot say conclusively (and I think this is what you were pointing out in your answer) what the writer here is really talking about as it relates to scripture.
What are your thoughts on what constitutes Inspired and what is not? What’s the standard?
What makes the 27 books of the NT, more inspired than other Christian works of the period that were not included in the Cannon?
Can a Christian Work today be considered inspired? If so, can we included it into the Bible or even consider it as scripture?
I will have to get to them when I have a couple of things in front of me that aren’t in reach at the moment. God bless,
Great question. These passages will really really help me in asking my pastor as to why we do not spend enough time in studying the old testament.
I’ve long been interested in what Paul meant by “Scripture” in 2Timothy, especially the Scripture that Timothy learned in infancy from his mother Eunice and grandmother Lois.
Here are my thoughts:
(1) With a Greek father, Timothy was raised in a Greek-speaking household
(2) Paul wrote to Timothy in Greek because Timothy could read Greek.
(3) Timothy’s mother and grandmother (who was probably a child when Jesus was a child) had access to a copy of the Scriptures.
(4) Timothy’s mother and grandmother taught the Scriptures to Timothy in language used the household, which was Greek
(5) The Greek translation read and taught in Timothy’s family was the commonly-used Septuagint translation
Questions: Do you agree that Timothy was raised on the Septuagint translation of Scripture? If not, what translation of Scripture do you think his mother/grandmother used?
Your brother in Christ,
This is pure fiction. Without any knowledge you state things like “Timothy’s mother had access to a copy of the scriptures!!” Do you have any idea what Jewsih life was like in Judah, Galillee, Samaria, in the first century CE? A woman who could read? A Torah scroll in the home?
You don’t have to be able to read to teach what you have been taught.
so how do we then know which writings we could consider to be inspired scripture? for example, if the Roman Catholic church were to all agree that something a pope wrote was inspired, would we then add that to our list of “inspired scripture”? if so, then couldn’t our bible be added to almost endlessly? and also, why do most protestants leave out the apocryphal texts that have been considered by many to be inspired works?
There were several rules used when establishing the canon. Had to have an apostolic connection, had to already be viewed as useful to church life, and several others. This would keep things tight with first century writings only. You may want to look up the canonization of scripture.
What do you mean Church Life? How anyone knowing scriptures can believe that a Hebrew born and raised Yahudin that lived by the instructions of Yahweh and teach others that was the way to eternal life and then change from a Yahudin and start a new religion and call it Christianity must not understand what the Torah teaches and has bought into the Catholic religion instituted by Constantine and carried forward by the Popes. By the way there is plenty of proof that the writings of the NT were written in Hebrew and or Aramaic.