Here is a link to the 11 page pdf of the critique. One note of irony was in the last paragraph, “The tone of the book itself is problematic, because the authors are so sure of themselves.” (p. 11). Wouldn’t it be problematic to be so sure that someone else is problematic for being sure? I can’t say that I have ever heard or read anyone more sure of himself than Driscoll. Have a read when you get a chance.